In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
The prompt asserts that the leaders who hold power shoule be required to abdicate after five years in the realm of buiness, politics, education, and government. From my perspective, I agree with the statement and believe that this approach would bring long-lasting prosperity.
Admittedly, keeping the power for a longer time is beneficial since the stability of power can guarantee the consistency of policies, which is undoubtedly a sigficant part in the overall healthy development of the institution or our society in general.
However, acknowleding the advantage of an abiding power does not change my stance that requiring those in power to step down after an arranged time holds more benefits thus should be the approach that we adopt. First and foremost, five years can be enough to realize a policy's goal, therefore requiring those in power to end serving would not harm the consistency of policies. In addition, it is widely admitted that competition stimulates development, and it also holds true when it comes to the people who are in power. When those in power are required to step down after five years, it opens the position for future candidates, therefore stimulates the competition between the potential future leaders.
People age, and more frequently than not, among those who are in power, there are more older people than younger ones. Older people are indeed generally more sophisticated and experienced, however, we must also admit that even though they still have the ability to make wise decisions in the last few years of their prime, with the growing of their age, the capabity to innovate is weakening as they are more and more confined to what they are familiar with. The healthy development needs young blood, not outmoded stereotypes from the past generation.
The statement made by the prompt concerns the essence of democracy. Democracy is what the modern society needs, not monarchy. One major differences among many between democracy and monarchy is that the leaders have to step away from the power when they end their service. The life-long serving might bring potential threats to democracy by placing one person's power superior. Take the example of George Washington, he insisted resigning after his service as president in order to entrench the republic, he was fully aware of how the extending power can impose a deadly threat to democracy.
In conclusion, I firmly supports the prompt's view that people should step down from power after five years since it conforms to the nature of democracy and presents more benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-18 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-16 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | jenas | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | Mirza Raquib | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | yfli | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
...among those who are in power, there are more older people than younger ones. Older people ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 349, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one person', 'a person', or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: one person; a person; persons
...tential threats to democracy by placing one persons power superior. Take the example of Geo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an impose a deadly threat to democracy. In conclusion, I firmly supports the pro...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 25, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'support'
Suggestion: support
...democracy. In conclusion, I firmly supports the prompts view that people should ste...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2160.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15513126492 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68566737013 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513126491647 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8108773312 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1875 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280769572481 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090580010323 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953610013609 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149274838625 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109325121817 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.