It is a natural process for animal species such as dinosaurs and dodos to become extinct.There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The contemporary era has borne witness to an alarming surge in ecological quandaries, with the extinction of animal species occupying a prominent position in public discourse. While some contend that this inexorable phenomenon is an inherent facet of natural evolution, thereby absolving mankind of any responsibility to intervene, I vehemently disagree with this perspective. In this essay, I shall expound upon three compelling rationales warranting the preservation of endangered animals.
First and foremost, the intricate interdependence inherent in our global ecosystem necessitates the safeguarding of animal species. Not only do we rely on domesticated livestock and poultry for sustenance, but the preservation of wild flora and fauna, even down to the minutiae of insects, is indispensable for acquiring a profound understanding of nature's intricate workings. Observing animal behavior enables us to discern precursors to imminent cataclysmic events, such as hurricanes or storms, thereby facilitating timely mitigation measures. Certain research even posits that the migration patterns of species can serve as indicators of pH level shifts, enabling farmers to preemptively avert crop failure. Therefore, the inextricable role of animals in human existence is beyond refute. By safeguarding their wellbeing, we simultaneously ensure a secure and harmonious future for our own prosperity.
Furthermore, given our complicity in driving numerous species to the precipice of extinction through industrialization and urbanization, society bears an unequivocal moral obligation to conserve and protect them. By encroaching upon animal habitats through deforestation for agricultural expansion, wanton hunting, and illegal trade, we have become unwitting agents of their decline. Consequently, it falls upon our collective shoulders to undertake proactive measures aimed at altering the course of these imperiled species' fate.
Finally, it is pertinent to address the counterargument that contends a laissez-faire approach to nature, devoid of human intervention, should be adopted. While it is true that extinction is an inherent facet of the natural order, the current velocity at which species are disappearing is disconcertingly high and predominantly attributable to human activities. We possess both the capacity and the ethical imperative to mitigate the deleterious consequences of our actions. By actively engaging in conservation endeavors, we not only ensure the survival of vulnerable species but also acknowledge the intrinsic worth of all living beings.
In conclusion, I ardently assert that the prevention of animal extinction assumes paramount importance for the preservation of ecosystems and the continued flourishing of humanity. The intricate interrelationships among species and our moral duty to rectify the inadvertent harm we have wrought compel us to take decisive action. By safeguarding endangered animals and their habitats, we perpetuate the tapestry of life on Earth, securing a sustainable future for ourselves and posterity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-03 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | LenhungSpeakingandWriting | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hello_there | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hello_there | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | hanhkatori2402 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Question The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What are the reasons for the growth of overweight people in society How can this problem be solved 89
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is positive while others think it is a negative development Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2636.0 1615.20841683 163% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01826484018 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47589674421 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 176.041082164 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 861.3 506.74238477 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8376833883 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.736842105 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175188728883 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472946239788 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285339226131 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924303395023 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181602458157 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 14.29 50.2224549098 28% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 186.0 78.4519038076 237% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.