In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
I find this idea unreasonable as skepticism hinder new leaders from bringing about innovations and breakthroughs.
Skepticism may deter new leaders from proposing new ideas and policies, thereby hindering reformations and breakthroughs. One of the major purposes for any organizations to have new leaders from time to time is to invigorate the organizations with the new perspectives and new practices brought by new leaders. Nevertheless, none of these will happen if new leaders think that their proposals are not welcomed. New leaders need an encouraging atmosphere to propose new practices as they already have a considerably great incentive to be cautious and play it save. New to the position, leaders face the pressure of building good rapport with their members and gaining trust and recognition from the organizations. If the new leaders find all of their actions under the strict scrutiny of members, they may feel that their leadership are threatened and choose to be conservative. Fearing that their progressive ideas may provoked their members and make them further doubt their leadership, leaders may follow old routines instead of bring new changes that are beneficial to the organizations. The US presidential elections is a case in point. Nowadays, the US faced various deeply rooted social problems from inequality, polarization, to the increasingly widening social gap. The resolution of all of these social problems take progressive reformations and innovations. During the presidential campaigns, many candidates show great resolution to tackle these problems and propose innovative and progressive measures. Nevertheless, when they are elected, most of them are intimidated by critics fierce attacks, and tend to play safe and follow the existing policies when they are supposed to bring about changes that deal with some deeply rooted structural problem in the society.
Some people may argue that since the new leaders have not yet proved their competences, blindly trusting new leaders may put the whole organization into great risks. Their concerns are reasonable in the past, when the selection process of the leaders is not democratic, so the leaders need to prove their competencies under the scrutiny of all members, yet this concern mostly don't apply to the contemporary society. In the contemporary society, we already have a sophisticated selection process of leaders in all fields, no matter it is business, education, or government. This means that the members already have a general knowledge to the leaders competence and leading styles, and they've already show their approval of the new leaders by selecting them out of the other candidates. In this case, it is more reasonable to show trust to the leaders that members have selected by themselves.
In conclusion, as long as the election process is democratic, trust should be granted to new leaders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | guozhishan | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | graceeehgq | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 50 | view |
- Claim In any situation the best way to persuade other people is to present them with facts and statistics rather than with emotional arguments Reason Facts are objective so they are more persuasive than subjective appeals Write a response in which you dis 66
- more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider ways in whic 16
- In business education and government it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree disagree with the claim In developi 58
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saves'?
Suggestion: saves
...at incentive to be cautious and play it save. New to the position, leaders face the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...of all members, yet this concern mostly dont apply to the contemporary society. In t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 615, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'general knowledge'.
Suggestion: general knowledge
...his means that the members already have a general knowledge to the leaders competence and leading s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 642, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...already have a general knowledge to the leaders competence and leading styles, and they...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 685, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...ders competence and leading styles, and theyve already show their approval of the new ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2444.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39514348786 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0629709837 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470198675497 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7728885751 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.631578947 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8421052632 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.10526315789 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190142452404 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719346463448 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435813858049 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116665167425 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408242480647 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saves'?
Suggestion: saves
...at incentive to be cautious and play it save. New to the position, leaders face the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...of all members, yet this concern mostly dont apply to the contemporary society. In t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 615, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'general knowledge'.
Suggestion: general knowledge
...his means that the members already have a general knowledge to the leaders competence and leading s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 642, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...already have a general knowledge to the leaders competence and leading styles, and they...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 685, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...ders competence and leading styles, and theyve already show their approval of the new ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2444.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39514348786 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0629709837 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470198675497 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7728885751 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.631578947 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8421052632 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.10526315789 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190142452404 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719346463448 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435813858049 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116665167425 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408242480647 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.