Reading for pleasure can develop imagination and language skills better than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, with the development of technology, visual media such as videos and pictures have become prevalent. It is said that books are more useful for imagination and language skills than watching TV. I totally agree with this statement, this essay will analyze the reasons.
First of all, it can not be denied that words in books can stimulate the imagination of a person. Novel is a point of the case. Although readers can not see any images which illustrate the content of the book, they can understand its implication by their own view. Moreover, an imaginative person is believed to have better non-linguistic skills than others. According to Johnson’s research, these individuals prefer reading books to watching TV. It involves their brain’s operation, if it is stimulated recently, its function can be improved and make humans become more intelligent and think faster.
Another reason for my opinion is that people have to think and imagine when reading books. It can be explained that readers also need a range of knowledge to understand the substance of books. Therefore, reading books has a more powerful impact on the thinking skills of humans. Although watching television is a good way to learn for people who have difficulty in reading, it is not effective for most individuals.
In conclusion, because of the ability to stimulate creativity and the essential of knowledge to understand the contents, reading books is a more effective way to modify the capabilities of linguistics and thinking. This action should be realized recently to improve personal mental health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-27 | Kha Linh | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | vankhanh2k60209@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people say that space tourism will be developed in the future What do you think space travel is positive or negative a development 78
- Reading for pleasure can develop imagination and language skills better than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below 67
- Although families have powerful influence on children the influence that comes from outside the family plays a bigger part in children s development To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21923076923 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87812346409 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2777045012 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254061230307 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837132189233 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825942985403 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140565857673 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069440335231 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.