Topic: The graph shows the number of people taking part in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005
The graph illustrates how many citizens participated in four categories of sports, including basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby in a certain area from 1985 to 2005.
In general, it is apparent that tennis was only the most dominant sport experiencing a positive trend throughout the examined period, whereas the opposite was true for basketball sport. Noticeably, both badminton and rugby were undergoing a level-off status in the whole period.
Looking at the graph, basketball gained popularity among citizens, taking the lead at approximately 250 in 2985. This figure was more than 100 people compared to the number of people playing tennis. It witnessed a significant change in the development of the two kinds of sports in the rest of the period. While the number of residents choosing tennis experienced a dramatic increase to reach roughly 230, the figure for basketball players underwent a rocket plummet by merely 5 times compared to the first mentioned year.
Regarding badminton and rugby, both of them accounted for a tiny part of the total number of people playing sports, at 50 and 75, respectively, in 1985. Notably, during the period, both of the two categories maintained a stable attraction fairly similar to the starting point.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-30 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Anne020304 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Anne020304 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | cassiexo | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Đức Tiến | view |
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 84
- Topic The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that we should divide students based on their academic ability while others think we should educate all students together Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, regarding, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28855721393 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89653091462 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63184079602 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6391693802 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190870188066 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694985676374 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490256419629 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100689599993 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372635074539 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.