An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment.
Why is this the case, and what solutions are possible?
It is true that the natural ecosystem suffers when the consumer items are produced more frequent. This essay attempts to shed light on the driving factors behind this problem before outlining several viable solutions that could be adopted to tackle this worrying issue.
There are two primary reasons as to why the significant manufacture of productions of commodities is fraught with pitfalls. First and foremost, this tendency is the premise of the resource depletion because of the necessity to extract natural resources such as minerals, timbers and fossil fuels for producing goods. Therefore, this serious concern will give rise to the soil erosion, habitat destruction and the depletion of valuable resources. Another driving factor is the pollution created from the process of goods manufacture. This is because the industrial process associated with consumer items production could release pollutant to the air, soil and water including emissions of greenhouse gases and discharge of chemical pollutant. Consequently, this act as a precursor to the climate change in global.
To combat this worrying issue, the following essential steps should be taken. The first measure is to implying sustainable production practice to minimize the environment damages. For instance, companies could invest on research and development in order to create environmentally friendly process such as recycled material and reduce the use of energy. In addition, another vital measure which should be concerned is the circulation economy which could mitigate waste and resource depletion. This is because productions are designed to be recycled easily and material could be reuse to create new goods. As a result, it will reduce the necessity of extract natural resources.
In conclusion, there are some serious repercussions attributable to this negative tendency, and ot is crucial that the aforementioned measures be implemented to deal with this issue.
- Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas Why Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 84
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 84
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 84
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59459459459 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93102313875 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.926408962 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194653557616 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635772509607 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339900016545 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113913337259 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359030012924 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.