Topic: The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors who came to the UK for different purposes between 1989 and 2009.
The graph illustrates how many foreign tourists traveled to the UK for three primary purposes, including holiday, business, and visits to friends or relatives from 1989 to 2009.
In general, it is apparent that foreign visitors came to the UK for the three main reasons undergoing a dramatic fluctuation in the examined period. Noticeably, it witnessed a positive rebounding trend in terms of taking a trip for a holiday to the UK at the end of the period, whereas the converse was true for the others.
Looking at the chart, the UK was one of the most promising destinations to attract overseas visitors, gaining popularity for them to have a holiday, standing at roughly 6.5 million of visitors in 1989. In the next 5 years, the figure continued to grow significantly until 1999 reaching the peak at approximately 9 million visitors before experiencing a considerable plummet in 2004. Surprisingly, after hitting the bottom, the number of foreign visitors coming for a holiday witnessed a drastic recovery to reach merely 9 million visitors in 2009.
Turning to the other purposes, while the number of tourists going on business in the UK was less than approximately 1 million in comparison with the figure for taking a holiday, tourists visiting their loved ones were only halving compared to the most popular purpose in 1989. Thereafter, the figure for visitors going on business underwent a sharp decrease to make up 4 million in 1994 before rising substantially again until 2004. In contrast, citizens spent more time visiting their friends and relatives, leading to the continual growth of standing at 6.5 million. Subsequently, both of them experienced a downward trend in maintaining their growth of around 6.5 million visitors at the end of the timeframe.
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- Topic The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
- Topic Some people say team sports football have lots of benefits Others say Individual sports swimming tennis are better Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Topic Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The table shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 965.302439024 154% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1275862069 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94382806263 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531034482759 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.44489563 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.7 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229554836474 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952248023475 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057708258841 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149353404035 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264528757491 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.