The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart presents information about the proportion of the urban population in four Asian countries between 1970 and 2020, as well as projected population from 2030 to 2040.
Overall, it is clear that the four Asian countries experience an increase population from 1970 to 2040, among the Malaysia and Indonesia show a dramatically increasing trend, while the Philippines and Thailand show a slightly rise.
The proportion of urban population in Philippines was similar with Malaysia, nearly accounting for 30% in 1970, while the percentage of total population lived in Malaysia was the highest after 1993 and predicted the most urban population after 2030. At the same time, Indonesia also become the second highest proportion of urban population countries in this period which was the lowest percentage in 1970 (13%) and exceeded the Thailand(28%) in 2002 and Philippines(41%) after 20l0.
The population in Philippines living in cities was the highest percentage in 1970, while decreased from 49% to 40% between 1990 and 2010 which become the second largest urban population city, then rising after 2010 which lower than Indonesia that projected the third largest urban countries in 2030. The urban population in Thailand was the third highest proportion during 1970(14%) and 2000(29%). However, the percentage of the population in Thailand living in city kept stably between 2000 to 2020 nearly 29%, then projected the proportion of urban population in 30% to 45% which is the lowest urban population country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor To what extent do you agree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowldege or experience 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Nowadays the trend of fashion changes very rapidly and gradually people become the salves of it Some people think that a person should choose comfortable clothes he or she likes regardless of fashion Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...while the Philippines and Thailand show a slightly rise. The proportion of urban population ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, then, third, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 3.97073170732 504% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35146443515 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77187731758 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44769874477 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6428143712 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.714285714 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1428571429 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263587312635 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147693217275 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937572872254 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1989618624 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890266797517 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.2329268293 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.