Technological development leads to lots of environmental issues. Some people think a simple lifestyle can preserve the environment while others argue that technology itself can solve it. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
In this day and age, people are putting increasing interest and emphasis on the capacity of technological enhancement to curb environmental problems. While some people are convinced that straightforward lifestyle can act as a catalyst to tackling this problem, others subscribe to the fact that technology can take over this mission. There are valid opinions to weigh both the sides of the discussion, which I will consider in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, it is noteworthy that uncomplicated lifestyle can mitigate the ramifications of environmental issues as it provides people easier access to alleviating the toxic wastes in the surroundings. This is because leading a simple life are likely to consist of utilizing organic products, which is considered to be environmentally friendly. By ways of illustration, Japanese people following a straightforward lifestyle usually opt for using paper bags instead of plastic bags whose decomposition existing after millions of years. This leads to the mitigation of plastic and other harmful substances impacts on our lives and provides impetus for environmental preservation. Through this lens, leading an uncomplicated life is of importance in the field of diminishing environmental deterioration.
On the other hand, those who disagree point out that technology plays a pivotal role in protecting the environment and there are multifarious reasons to endorse this view. That is to say with the advent of technology, people have a chance of taking its advantage to invent immeasurable innovations aiming to safeguarding the environment. For example, during the 4.0 industrial revolution, distinguished brands specialized in mechanism are manufacturing more and more novel electric vehicles to meet people’s satisfaction of ensuring environmental sustainability. There are a number of electric cars put to use in several countries, which leads to a significant decrease in the proportion of particulate matter and other harmful wastes in the air, resulting in the melioration of airborne pollution. Therefore, it is evident that besides straightforward lifestyle, technological development can open up avenues for preserving the surroundings.
In conclusion, it is quite difficult to decide which point of view is sounder and more logical. However, from the previous discussion, I am convinced to assert that technology itself makes great inroads in the field of safeguarding the surroundings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-03 | linhdk35 | 78 | view |
| 2015-06-17 | tranquanghai | 90 | view |
- Technological development leads to lots of environmental issues Some people think a simple lifestyle can preserve the environment while others argue that technology itself can solve it Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in london in 2010 Summerize the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- People living in large cites today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 78
- Write an essay at least 250 words on the following topic School should be a safe environment for learning and developing however school violence seems to be increasing Where does this problem come from What should we do to change the situation Give reason 84
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72282608696 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51454831496 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3419700415 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.4 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293018436218 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085981010138 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596097863622 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16202818114 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756274929617 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.