Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are devoted to the protection of wild animals.what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recent years have witnessed a significant change in how people protect the wild environment, especially animals. This has led to a common belief that it is a waste that people spend a huge number of observations and money for conservation of wild animals with which I completely disagree. This essay will elaborate on the reasons for my personal perspective.
First of all, the main reason why I fully protest this view is because of their ecological roles. First and foremost, wildlife has an important role in the ecosystem. Some rare animals are threatened by hunters for claws, horns or skins which could lead to mass extinction and affect the whole life. For instance, the disappearance of Saola in Indochina due to habitat loss and illegal hunting led to reduction in the diversity and the impact on the region's food chain. The loss of Saola could affect the natural landscape and some carnivores which use them for food.
Furthermore, the economic values of protecting wildlife are indisputable. It is possible that protecting wild animals could keep them alive for further generations to learn about biodiversity. In addition, animal conservation centers and national parks could bring profits to the locals. To illustrate, the money paid for these animals could be the resources for the improvement of local life which could turn back for continuing support for flora and fauna.
In conclusion, there is ample evidence in the benefit of animal preservation including ecological and economical benefits. It is my conviction that animal protection should continue to maintain the origin of natural life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | linhlinh123 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are devoted to the protection of wild animals what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the kiwi
- The table below shows the number of female prisoners by race and age in 2015 73
- Some people think that schools should teach enroll students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities skills studying together Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey which asked people what they thought the main causes of crime were 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e reasons for my personal perspective. First of all, the main reason why I full...
^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
... in the diversity and the impact on the regions food chain. The loss of Saola could aff...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me carnivores which use them for food. Furthermore, the economic values of prot...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontinuing support for flora and fauna. In conclusion, there is ample evidence i...
^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...l preservation including ecological and economical benefits. It is my conviction that anim...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23846153846 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8830662507 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.199141919 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116177894433 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043000814352 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034600399963 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765100486315 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251773013091 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e reasons for my personal perspective. First of all, the main reason why I full...
^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
... in the diversity and the impact on the regions food chain. The loss of Saola could aff...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me carnivores which use them for food. Furthermore, the economic values of prot...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontinuing support for flora and fauna. In conclusion, there is ample evidence i...
^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...l preservation including ecological and economical benefits. It is my conviction that anim...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23846153846 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8830662507 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.199141919 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116177894433 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043000814352 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034600399963 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765100486315 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251773013091 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.