In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Infrastructure is one of the vital facilities in the country that should be continuously improved. While some people see that governments should invest more in building additional railway lines, others believe that improving the existing public transport is a priority. This essay will discuss both views and address why I advocate the second one.
On the one hand, funding the construction of new railways for fast trains will bring many benefits not only to the public but also to the economy of the country. Trains as a way of traveling between cities are fast, convenient, and cost-effective; the passenger will reach his destination while saving much time and money especially those who are commuting for work or study. Additionally, trains can be used to transport cargo from ports to many different parts of the country, subsequently, this will refresh the economic flow in the country.
However, I believe that most of the investment should be directed toward the improvement of public transportation due to vital and more effective advantages that can be gained. Works to improve public transport such as road refurbishment, increasing the number of traffic lights and roundabouts, and bus renewing will encourage more people to use public transportation rather than their own cars which in turn will result in significant relief in traffic congestion due to drop in the number of vehicles in the road. Subsequently, the amount of carbon dioxide that is released by the engines of these vehicles will decrease and lower the negative effect on the environment.
In conclusion, although building new railway systems could be advantageous to the public and the country, I see that improving public transportation is more crucial and adds more positives including reducing traffic congestion and lowering air pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 84
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this 84
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Today TV channels show more men s sports than women s sports Why is this the case Should TV channels give equal time to women s sports and men s sports 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...e used to transport cargo from ports to many different parts of the country, subsequently, thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32413793103 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02906255733 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572413793103 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.9659073077 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.4 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303670448565 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113597447977 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649459210276 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174084730318 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469720151444 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.