The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009.
The bar chart illustrates the expenditure proportions of five categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Japan in 2009.
Overall, in 2009, four countries spent mostly on housing and least on clothing and health care. It is also noticeable that the food and transportation expenditure shares had the opposite data in four regions.
In 2009, the United States’s expenditure on housing ranked first with nearly a quarter, 5% more than that of Canada. In terms of food, there was a huge gap between the expenses of the UK and Japan and that of the other countries. The US only spent under 15%, less than approximately half that of Japan. The opposite pattern can be seen in the category of transportation, where the United States and Canada’s percentage exceeded that of Japan (10%) nearly by half.
Regarding healthcare, the United States regained its first place despite being less than 10%. However, the expenditure of the US on clothing remained at last place with a slight gap less than that of Canada (over 5%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-08 | reverjae | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-08 | reverjae | 78 | view |
- The bar chart on the next page shows the results of a survey of the reading habits of male and female first year university students at a university in the UK The pie chart show the amount of time male and female students spend on various activities 92
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 84
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94285714286 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75281525656 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577142857143 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5628445693 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368456940848 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150825932343 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16543810598 0.0843802449381 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250709200466 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198373747858 0.0819641961636 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.