As machines have become more sophisticated, more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
Physical jobs, which include a lot of strength, are now becoming less demanding and can be automatically processed by cutting-edge machines. This trend is still causing controversy over its impact on the industrialized industry, but I support the idea that it has more advantages than drawbacks.
On the one hand, this trend has evolutionary effects on the quality of jobs and working conditions today. In the past few years, workers used to have unsafe working conditions and used to lack crucial gadgets for work. However, in today’s time, due to the enhancement of machines, jobs are becoming less demanding, and with the help of modern technological equipment, production is becoming higher. Thus, all workers do today is supervise machines performing the tasks. Moreover, working conditions are much safer than in the past; therefore, they help prevent unpredictable accidents. In a fast-changing world, modern machines support workers with their workplace and the difficulties their demanding jobs cause; thus, they improve their living standards.
On the other hand, it is argued that machines could lessen the number of jobs available for the unemployed. Thus, some people believe that if machines are responsible for 80% of our work duty in a machine, workers are likely to become jobless. Although machines make physical jobs less tiring for workers, they are likely to increase the percentage of unemployment. Generally, this trend’s drawback is not as challenging as we assume, considering its benefits.
In conclusion, although this trend still causes difficulty in modern life, I agree that its positive contributions outweigh its disadvantage.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people think that mental strength is the most important factor for success in sports However some others believe that it is more important to have strong and fit people Discuss both views and give your opinions 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'supervised'.
Suggestion: supervised
...g higher. Thus, all workers do today is supervise machines performing the tasks. Moreover...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 5.60731707317 428% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48249027237 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0481358797 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599221789883 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6398500344 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260067292607 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805853169431 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042486322769 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136632129009 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352920666613 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.