Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree
Popular believe is that innovations such as videos, computer and internet distract students and affect a student’s learning. Yet, modern innovations have improved our everyday life and transformed the world. If used in appropriate way, can contribute in development of learner. Hence, I mostly disagree with author’s stand that innovation impede learning for two reasons that I will explain below. However, I do concede that technology should be used as supplementary factor to support learning.
Modern innovation has positive impact on learning and improved our learning experience. For instance, Internet is one of the most powerful tool of present time. It plays a vital role to provide easy access to knowledge. It also improved quality of education and reduced burden of high cost. Online tutorial videos, recorded lectures and forums not only provides quality study material to students but also reduced constraints of place and time. Moreover, internet supports mass connectivity. For example, a teacher takes online classes and large number of students from different geography simultaneously joins the class. Thus, even an unprivileged student from country side have access to wealth of knowledge, which was not possible earlier. The aspirant can acquire primary education as well as upgrade his skills. By this way, internet served him with possibilities to improve his life. Further, internet keeps student up to date with latest information of relevant topics. Overall, these benefits will be impossible without technology.
Further, if we compare teaching method now and 50 yrs back, technology has improved student-teacher interaction many folds. Earlier teachers explain concepts with the help of books, figures etc. Now, complex concepts can be understood easily. For example, 3D models of atom or chemical bond, animated structure of animals, space videos, audios, colorful pictures augment learning experience. These features assist teacher to explain concepts in a better way. Students have more interactive and inclusive sessions with teacher. They find learning more interesting and able to visualize what is being taught to them. As a result, they have solid understanding of concept and are able to apply them in their future projects. Education is one of the pillars of sustainable development of nation and internet plays significant role in education.
However, I do concede that over dependence on technology may hinder student’s logical thinking and thus his overall learning. The apt example of this is transformed learning approach by AI. Too much reliance on AI-driven learning tools will affect student’s ability to think creatively, critically and independently. In near future, while AI can replace human educator in classroom, it cannot replace insights, adaptability and compassion that a human teacher provide. This will hinder development of interpersonal abilities. Thus until technology is used as supplementary tool it is beneficial. However, once it dominates, consequences are not favorable.
Overall, contribution of technology is vast spread and common in present time therefore we are not able to notice its impact. For example, Internet is the most potent force for shaping modern learning and innovation. Yet, technology should not regulate the process of learning but should support it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-28 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-19 | Zahid6400 | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Feiyang Wang | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | weonalaz | 58 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 54
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 16
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 62
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 16
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 933, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...ther, internet keeps student up to date with latest information of relevant topics. Overall...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...ios, colorful pictures augment learning experience. These features assist teacher to expla...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 526, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...development of interpersonal abilities. Thus until technology is used as supplementa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2844.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60946745562 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97214771915 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570019723866 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 893.7 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8020737437 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0833333333 23.4991977007 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.86111111111 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 26.0 10.2758426966 253% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196835772188 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428976852661 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414951536748 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109497819773 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393820167389 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.