It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should stop this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?"
The modern era of urbanization has witnessed severe extinction of animal species as their habitats have become continuously hazardous. It is argued by some that this is a natural process and humans have no responsibility to deter this from happening. I just partly agree with this viewpoint as people also must be accountable for what they have impacted negatively on the wild environment to protect endangered species as well as retain benefits that people can get from animals.
To commence with, the notion that there is no compelling reason for humans to ameliorate the animals’ extinction is sound to some extent. The first reason is that some species have disappeared due to natural changes even before human intervention. Indeed, certain groups of species, such as dinosaurs or dodos, ... died when they succumbed to hostile changes in habitats which is proven to stem from nature’s impact on the Earth or even from other planets’ influences. Moreover, the loss of certain animal species is also a foundation for another evolution in which new species may appear with stronger survival ability so it is unnecessary to hinder it. To illustrate, after the era of dinosaurs ended, life on Earth continued followed by the emergence of other species which are supposed to be descendants of them.
However, I still opine that people must take responsibility for alleviating environmental issues and protecting wild animals. While many wild beasts went extinct from natural causes, a greater proportion of species are in danger or no longer extant due to human activities. Mass deforestation to build infrastructure or for timber harvesting has cost wild animals their living habitats, leading to food source depletion and eventually, death. Moreover, the more precious animals disappear, the more benefits from such animals people lose so protecting wildlife is also for the sake of human life. For instance, scientists have discovered solutions to fatal diseases as a result of research conducted on animals and substances extracted from animals’ bodies. Without those precious sources, a new epidemic may become incurable, beginning the collapse of human civilization.
In conclusion, although people cannot struggle with the natural selection process in which some animals die because of the lack of survival ability, humans still should take the onus to prevent negative artificial impacts on the environment. This not only protects endangered animals but also is beneficial to human life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Some people think music plays an important role in society Others think it is it is simply a form of entertainment Discuss both sides and opinion 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4056122449 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9207915341 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2472605842 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.647058824 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0588235294 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27607805448 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906179418642 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469086634271 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179055625995 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455230649143 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.