The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of households by consumption of electrical appliances in three distinct groups, while the second line graph show the number of housework per week in ownerships in one country from 1920 to 2019.
It is obvious that, the refrigerator had a dramatically upward trend and reached peak. All groups of electrical appliances had an upward trend, while in another line graph there was a downward trend throughout between 1920 and 2019.
As can be seen the percentage of washing machine slightly increased during the time more than 30% to upper 70% except a suddenly dropped about 9% in 1980. By 1920 the refrigerator from 30% had steady increased until 2000 that has reached peak. The vacuum cleaner there was minimum percent in 1920 and increased to reach peak before other groups in 1980. It seems people who lives in the country have more interest to use this electrical appliance, while this is completely different in second graph and there was a downward trend between 1920 and 2019 approximately 40% to 10% in 2019.
As a result, people use electrical appliances a lot in this country and the number of hours per week reduce during these years.
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 73
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...trend throughout between 1920 and 2019. As can be seen the percentage of washing m...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92537313433 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66016136794 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.65674135 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188460575784 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777805697254 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068535262574 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1218884843 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572314429998 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.