Many young people today change their jobs or careers every few years. Do you think this has more advantages than disadvantages?
In recent years, an increasing number of young individuals are opting for skipping their jobs after only a couple years. In this essay, both the pros and cons of this trend will be examined to prove why its disadvantages might outweigh the benefits.
Admittedly, there are some advantages that young people can potentially gain from shifting jobs frequently. By changing jobs frequently, they can have the opporturnities to experience a wider variety of environment in different companies and discover their favourable types of working environment which are compatible with their characteristics. Through this process, young citizens can presumably gain a better insight in the job market and companies which can support them with choosing a long-term career path to pursue. Moreover, the experiences they acquire from various corporations are precious. They can gain young candidates a sharp edge over their peers, ensuring a higher chance of landing a decent occupation.
However, there are various consequences of job-skipping in contemporary society that might transcend its benefits, chief among them is the lack of financial independence. Changing jobs frequently might correspond with the young individuals’ inability to attain a stable livelihood due to the no-income gaps between each time they quit their jobs and search for new ones. This indicates that during this time, they might have to financially rely on parental support or governmental subsides which can be an encumbrance for both parents and the state budget. Hence, frequent job-changing might pose a risk of unemployment on young citizens. In recent years, the job market has witnessed massive laid-off waves of companies, from mega corporations like Meta to small businesses due to economic recession. For example, Meta, the mother company of Facebook, have fired more than ten thousand employees in its headquater only in the last half of 2023. Therefore, there might be a shortage of vacancies for young candidates despite their stellar CV, meaning they might be forced to work in areas that are different from their tertiary expertise or previous experiences. This might potentially lead to a pitiful waste of skilled labor force which might undermine national economic and development prospect in the long run.
In conclusion, shifting jobs frequently can derive a number of benefits for young people. Nevertheless, its disadvantages are far more concerning and might exert more detrimental impacts on the employees themselves and their nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | hieuasroma@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public or should a charge even a voluntary one be levied for admittance Discuss this issue and give your opinion 82
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- Many young people today change their jobs or careers every few years Do you think this has more advantages than disadvantages 78
- Throughout history people have dreamed of living in a perfect society but they have not agreed on what an ideal society would be like What do you think is the most important element of a perfect society in the modern world How can people work towards achi 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51025641026 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01837567509 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3302376988 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.411764706 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221873068859 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759616375212 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414756183631 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145052532051 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112800816088 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.