Some argue that the expansion of multinational corporations and the phenomenon of globalization bring about beneficial results for all individuals. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?
In recent years, the proliferation of multinational companies have been subject to much debate. While some believe that the presence of these entities and the concept of globalization yield positive outcomes for everyone involved, there is a growing concern regarding their overall impact. I completly agree that development of multinational enterprises offer many posetive opportunities to the population and can be helpful in various aspects.
On one hand, proponents of multinational companies and globalization argue that these forces can lead to economic growth and development in various regions worldwide. The presence of large corporations often provide society with job creation, technological advancements, and increased trade opportunities. This can result in improved living standards, enhanced infrastructure, and access to a wider array of products and services for local populations. Take a multinational pharmacutical company as example. Many governments are not adequatly equipped with state-of-the-art technologies to produce advance drug formulations. Expansion of multinatinal companies,therefore, can make their products available to all patients and prevent from smuggling and trade fraud.
Conversely, critics contend that the spread of multinational corporations and globalization can have detrimental effects on certain communities and the environment. They believe that market expansion may lead to exploitation of labor, unequal wealth distribution, and environmental degradation. Furthermore, the homogenization of cultures and values due to increased global interconnectedness can threaten local traditions and identities, resulting in a loss of diversity and unique societal characteristics.
In conclusion, boundaries can not slow down the expansion of multinational companies and globalization which can indeed have positive gains such as economic growth and enhanced living quality for individuals. The drawbacks that were pointed out by opponents can be managed wisely by authorities and I belive that govermnets should supervise and encourage the global market growth to achive the desired outcomes.
- In many countries people now wear western style dresses such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 56
- In many countries people now wear western style dresses such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some argue that the expansion of multinational corporations and the phenomenon of globalization bring about beneficial results for all individuals Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 89
- Some believe it is more important for cities and towns to invest heavily in building large outdoor public spaces To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some countries invest in specialized sports facilities for top athletes but not for the average people Is this a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ltinational companies have been subject to much debate. While some believe that th...
^^
Line 3, column 661, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , therefore
...ons. Expansion of multinatinal companies,therefore, can make their products available to a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.25 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.68059091073 2.80592935109 131% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4485386429 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194957190912 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617424870232 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241969424523 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112661963891 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288055220048 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.32 50.2224549098 32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.97 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.