The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features, and make comprasions where relevant.
The table illustrates the average distance in miles traveled per person per year in eight distinct modes of travel in 1985 and 2000. It is obvious that the car has the most distance among other modes and the Taxi has the lowest, in addition, the total distance in 1985 was higher than in 2000.
As can be seen, the Walikng, Bycilce, and local buses were reduced in 2000 by 18, 10, and 47 numbers, and other remaining groups increased in 2000. The most important group that increased significantly was cars by about 1700 miles. The Taxi, Train, Long distance bus, and car modes ordered rise approximately 29, 75, 70, and 1700 miles. Taxis and bicycles were used under 100 miles in 1985 and 2000 which meant people did not like to use these modes of travel. By contrast, the statistics showed people in society have a good tendency to use Car mode for traveling.
As a result, the total average distance in miles by 2000 rose around 2000 miles while some groups declined and some else went up.
- Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same to periods Summariz 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58426966292 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25585408814 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.4080648495 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142613816994 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655841791674 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440255745752 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985035201829 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447543630455 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.