The graph shows the value in US dollars (in millions of dollars) of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the amount of money in investment in funds of four different categories such as property, gold, fine art and company shares in the US between 1988 and 2014.
Overall, while the proportions in all of four categories saw an increase, the figures for gold and fine art experienced an upward trend over 26 years. Units in the essay are measured in millions of US dollars.
Regarding to the spending in gold, between 1988 and 2006, it rose gradually from 100 to over 150, before rocketing dramatically to above 350 in 2014. Likewise, the investment in fine art underwent a fluctuation from 1988 to 2006, staying at under 100, before rising remarkably to over 300 in 2014.
Furthermore, the figures of property were 50 in 1988, which grew gradually up to 150 in 2014. Finally, the company shoes' funds climbed significantly up to 150 in 8 years, before going up slightly to above 200 in 2014, staying at the third highest funds in the US.
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their families and friends Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 168 200
No. of Characters: 767 1000
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.6 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.565 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.661 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 39 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.969 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.483 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.483 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.202 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4