Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers.Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There are many opinions that believe that it would be more beneficial for major corporations and industries to relocate to areas outside of large cities. This though could be advantageous, if its merits exceed demerits. This essay agrees with that belief completely because of the benefits it brings to people and cities. The essay will first look at limitations of moving to far areas, outside the cities. Secondly, it will illustrate how useful it is for people and the environment to move companies far from the core of the cities.
In the past, leaders and entrepreneurs thought about establishing their companies near to their employee’s homes, thinking in the interest of them. Over time, these start-up companies became larger in size, expanding in branches and their work force. Now, the existence of these locations inside the core of large cities makes it overcrowded, noisy, and polluted. However, deciding to move these locations outside of the cities is going to be charged for workers. Employees will be ought to travel long distances every day. Therefore, more money is going to be spent on gas, more time would be wasted on roads.
On the other hand, there are many cones of relocating these companies and industries out of the cities. To begin with, the killing jam conjugation would be end inside the cities especially at early hours of the day. So, less time to be wasted commuting inside cities’ streets and more calm and psychological comfort. Additionally, less vehicles exhaust to be in the air, would contribute to better health of citizens and less diseases. Finally, Land and buildings are typically cheaper outside major cities, allowing companies to reduce overhead costs. This can free up capital for investment in areas like research or employee benefits.
In conclusion, many advocate for the potential benefits of moving large companies and factories out of big cities. Taking such a decision like that should be thoughtful well from all aspects. Depending on the conducted comparison, I believe that it is useful to move large companies and factors outside large cities. Although some advantages of this decision, many merits will accrue to people, employees, environments, and the companies themselves.
- The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 11
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 61
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 73
- Some people think that enjoying the present is more important than planning for the future for both countries and individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: larger
...r time, these start-up companies became larger in size, expanding in branches and their work f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nd psychological comfort. Additionally, less vehicles exhaust to be in the air, woul...
^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun diseases is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ribute to better health of citizens and less diseases. Finally, Land and buildings a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advocate seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advocates'.
Suggestion: many advocates
...h or employee benefits. In conclusion, many advocate for the potential benefits of moving la...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2044198895 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75719393088 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533149171271 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0407816777 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.7142857143 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2380952381 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30041116678 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825174353756 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595790445423 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182689463648 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387553888228 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.