In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays, people store knowledge on the internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is argued that storing knowledge on the online environment is increasingly popular rather than physical books. This essay will disclose some benefits of this new storing method and then argue that the advance way is vital as long as people are conscious of disadvantages to control well.
There are plenty of advantages that the internet could provide digital stores for publishers and authors. Indeed, the appearance of storing platforms such as Google Drive and iCloud allow users to be convenient to save their database which are a lot of advance types. This means that digital products including videos, audios and images cannot base in printed books. Hence, storing on the internet is an optimal solution in digital generation with diverse kinds of storing demands. Additionally, the internet helps people save storing space as online stores is so small that people do not invest in expensive giant libraries to consist of physical books. For example, Kindle readers produced by Amazon can store thousands of digital documents. It also is a such tiny dimension that owners take way to anywhere and anytime. This reveals many positive applications with regard to the internet.
Given aforementioned benefits, the internet generally is deemed a crucial facility to store information in technology edge because storing in printed books is impossible to meet requirements with various kinds of knowledge. However, users must be mindful of database security as loose protection’s firewall is the road that hackers could steal the information. It is common to hear about huge cyber attacks on internet space. They take away important database and then sent blackmails to owners. Moreover, taking advantage of digital stores is dependent on platform’s providers. To be more detailed, each action of a user could be recorded and tracked by artificial machines. Thus, providers may collect insight’s users to exploit and sell them to third-parties regardless of available private policies. Therefore, users should recognize reliable platforms to place knowledge to avoid any unexpected damage.
In conclusion, the internet is perfectly vital virtual stores with many benefits. Nonetheless, users should verify digital platforms and take control several risks on storing activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-23 | MinhGoal1 | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | namanpluck | 90 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | duckymomokhongphailarapper | 87 | view |
| 2022-05-02 | Josie-e3 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | DIEU PHUONG | 76 | view |
- In many countries people increasingly talk about money how much they earn or how much they pay for things in their daily conversations Why Is this a positive or negative trend 92
- Many employees can now do their work from home using modern technology However this change may only benefit workers not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 67
- Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen a pencil or brush What are the reasons for this Is the decline in writing by hand a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50991501416 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84437603102 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594900849858 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9702330967 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329090037986 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878454874082 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761439181947 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195535300222 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668616380608 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.