The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began
The charts detail the number of participants at the Olympics every 30 years from 1924 to 2014 in total and by gender. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that whereas the total number of occupants in Olympic tournament increased consistently, in terms of the participations between two genders was huge which narrowed significantly by the end of the period.
In 1924, the disparity between the sexes was significant with just over 100 women and precisely 3000 men. Over the next 30 years, the figure for males rose to 4,500 and women more than double to a still minor 500. In 1984, there was more impressive growth for women (1,800) and a steady increase for men (5,100). Finally, the difference between the genders narrowed considerably in 2014 with 5,800 men and 4,900 of their female counterparts participating in the Olympics.
In terms of the overall totals, the data began at slightly over 3,000 in 1924 and rose consistently for the next 90 years, reaching a final high of greater than 10,000 in 2014.
- The diagram details the process of producing olive oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The given line chart demonstrates average attendance at the cinema across age demographics in the US between 2000 and 2011 Looking from an overall perspective it is readily apparent that young people especially teenagers and young adults tend to go to the 73
- The diagram details the process of producing olive oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some parts of the world traditional festivals and celebrations have disappeared or are disappearing What do you think are the causes of this development and what measures could be taken to solve it 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 937.175257732 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 206.0 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90285714286 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76299748499 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 127.690721649 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3939508965 44.8134815571 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 76.5299724578 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 16.8248392259 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 4.34317383033 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0712148122255 0.216113520407 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354926485879 0.0766984524023 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423978666386 0.0603063233224 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0500861350645 0.12726935374 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406386211061 0.0580467560999 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 8.37731958763 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 8.71597938144 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 937.175257732 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 206.0 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90285714286 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76299748499 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 127.690721649 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3939508965 44.8134815571 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 76.5299724578 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 16.8248392259 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 4.34317383033 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0712148122255 0.216113520407 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354926485879 0.0766984524023 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423978666386 0.0603063233224 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0500861350645 0.12726935374 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406386211061 0.0580467560999 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 8.37731958763 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 8.71597938144 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.