The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000.
The given diagram depicts the prouction levels of the primary types of fuel including petroleum, natural gas and coal in America in the period of 19 years from 1981 and 2000.
Overall, petroleum was manufactured with the highest quantity, which was opposed to the natural gas. It was noticeable that the coal took place of the natural gas throughout the years.
Among these three kinds of fuels, petroleum was consistently produced with the highest quantity. Its figure began at about 95 tons, which witnessed an upward and rose to 140 tons in the next 5 years and declined substantially to roughly 100 tons in 1991. From 1991 onward, the figures started to rebound and finally reached a peak at about 140 tons in 2000.
The remaining fuels including coal and natural gas started at 80 tons and 40 tons correspondingly in 1981.
The production ouput of coal fluctuated from 40 tons to about 42 tons until 1991, which saw a constant impressive growth to about 102 tons in the final years. Meanwhile, the figure for manufactured coal observed a downward trend, it dipped to approximately 39 tons and rose again to 60 tons in 1986. From 1986 onward, the figure decreased significantly and finally reached a bottom at about 38 tons in 2000.
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 73
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 84
- Today many people do not know their neighbors Why is this What can be done about this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...42 tons until 1991, which saw a constant impressive growth to about 102 tons in t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8544600939 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69192232633 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530516431925 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3024751464 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0811968713618 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382075665572 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450376131412 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597277085542 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051929252366 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.