The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began
The charts detail the number of participants at the Olympics every 30 years from 1924 to 2014 in total and by gender. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that while the totals rose steadily, there was more dramatic growth in terms of female participants to the point where there emerged a less noticeable gap between the genders by the end of the period
In 1924, the disparity between the sexes was significant with just over 100 women and precisely 3000 men. Over the next 30 years, the figure for males rose to 4,500 and women more than double to a still minor 500. In 1984, there was more impressive growth for women (1,800) and a steady increase for men (5,100). Finally, the difference between the genders narrowed considerably in 2014 with 5,800 men and 4,900 of their female counterparts participating in the Olympics.
In terms of the overall totals, the data began at slightly over 3,000 in 1924 and rose consistently for the next 90 years, reaching a final high of greater than 10,000 in 2014.
- Some experts suggest that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some educationalists think that a programme of international exchange visits would benefit all teenage school students Do you think the benefits of such a programme would outweigh any disadvantages 73
- The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018 67
- The chart shows requests for information at a tourist office in the United Kingdom from January to June 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 937.175257732 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74860335196 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54179507429 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 16.3608247423 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.3303248607 44.8134815571 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 76.5299724578 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 16.8248392259 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 4.34317383033 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0604412601817 0.216113520407 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353986689194 0.0766984524023 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429192827134 0.0603063233224 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.04340791335 0.12726935374 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313070017364 0.0580467560999 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 8.37731958763 190% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 7.45979381443 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 8.62886597938 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 8.54432989691 159% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.