The graph shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons.
The line graph illustrates the data on the number of people who visited a Caribbean island (stayed on cruise ships and stayed on the island) in the 7-year period, starting from 2010.
Overall it can be observed that the total number of tourists in millions escalated and displayed an upward trend whereas visitor's preferences for staying on cruise ships exhibited a significant increase over the period.
Examining the dataset of total visitors in more detail, it is clear that only one million tourists traveled to the Caribbean island in 2010. Thereafter it rose to 2.75 million in 2016. After a dramatic jump from 2016 to 2017, it climbed to 3.5 million which is the highest over the period.
Turning to the remaining information, it is evident that about 0.75 million of people stayed on the island in 2010 whereas it was 0.25 for staying on cruise ships. In 2014, size of tourists increased to 1.5 and 1 million respectively for staying on cruise ships and islands. While, the number of visitors who stay on cruise ships climbed to 2 million in 2017, size of tourists staying on the island fluctuated slightly and reached the same level as in 2015.
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is the best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the both view and give your opinion 78
- The picture below shows the life cycle of the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is a good thing if senior management workers in a company get a much higher salary than other workers in the same company Do you agree or disagree 56
- The line graph shows the percentages of Australian exports with four countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting for the total energy from 1971 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82412060302 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50910314575 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497487437186 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0623124246 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155660783359 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775186651138 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616152878375 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11115641649 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552077765784 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.