The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain. The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed
The given table illustrates the sources of funding for police and the pie chart depicts how it was distributed.
Overview, the sources of money that was funded for police increased and local taxes was the greatest contribution among other demographics. In terms of distribution, more money was spent on technology, building and transport was unchanged and although funding for salaries declined, it was still the most-spent category.
Concerning the sources of funding for police, 175.5 million pounds was contributed by the national government in 2017 and increased by 2,3 million pounds in the following year. Local taxes contributed with lower figures in both years, but its figure increased considerably from 91.2 million pounds in 2017 to 102.3 million pounds in 2018. Notably, the contribution of other sources such as grants witnessed a minimal change between 2017 and 2018 increasing only 5 million pounds from 38 million pounds to 38,5 million pounds. The total figure grew by 13.9 to 318.6m
According to the pie charts, salaries was the highest expense in 2017 with the figure being recorded at 75%, other aspects observed a converse pattern with 17% for buildings and transport and 8% for technology. In 2018, the figure for expenditure on salaries decreased by 6% to 69%, while the proportion of spending on technological sector increased to 14% and allocating budget on buildings and transport remained unchanged
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 73
- The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 73
- The pie charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30837004405 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84788048499 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537444933921 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1853129265 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.625 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155163437471 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085376914552 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735678555336 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124120621059 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883371073637 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.