In some cultures, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message?
Can children carry out anything as long as they strive for it enough? It is firmly believed and educated to children in some cultures, but this argument, from my perspective, can contribute to both benefits and detrimental results.
On the one hand, giving children the message that they can realize whatever goals with their enough attempt has several advantages. The overriding benefit is that this behavior enhances children's self-confidence and motivation. Telling them their possibilities to complete some tasks or goals will envision themselves seeing the promising blueprint and enable them to be determined to finish it with realistic actions, including engaging more time and energy to it and concentrating themselves on it, which will finally contribute to the success. Additionally, it is a fascinating way to encourage them to push their boundaries and surpassing themselves. Their potential capabilites can be aroused.
On the other hand, critics may hold the belief that this behavior exert a negative impact on children. First and foremost, they would not recognize their actual abilities and something they may really not adept at, because there are definitely challenging things they can not accomplish, sometimes even difficult for an adult. If they are repeatedly told they could do that, they will be brainwashed to trust themselves blindly. But may be after quite a long time they still find they fail in achieveing it, a sense of letting everyone down and disappointment is inclined to appear, which leads them to be skeptical of their abilities and even some mental problems like anxiety or despression. Moreover, it leads to an atmosphere that everyone only knows trying hard instead of thinking out of box. There are perhaps multiple methods such as asking other for suggestions or looking it from another perspective.
In conclusion, telling children to achieving anything by trying hard is a double-edge sword, with the positive effects of giving them confidence and the guidance of unlimit themselves, but also with the negative impacts on leading them to a possbile wrong road.
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 78
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 79
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 54
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which e result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 78
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trying hard is a double-edge sword, with the positive effects of giving them conf...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, may, moreover, really, so, still, even so, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33532934132 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94767739698 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577844311377 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.5318101683 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347465373624 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117510709496 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886516665302 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211140164488 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600511646702 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.