In today’s digital age, anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs. this accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been argued that due to the digital revolution, photographic experts are no longer high on demand. While I accept that technological advancements can replace them in several circumstances, I believe that visual professions remain generally indispensable.
On the one hand, advocates of technology highlight its superiority in supporting photographic novices. To begin with, it is widely witnessed that smartphones have been equipped with visual features like filters and editors, which enable users to adjust the colour, contrast and sharpness of the images. Therefore, as long as meticulous attention to artistic expression is unnecessary, just as people often post an update on social media, such functions can sufficiently satisfy their demand. Besides the informational purposes, instant capture of the moment has been more favourable than ever thanks to portable electronic devices. Indeed, while hiring a photographer may be costly and time-consuming, the ubiquity and affordability of smartphones have enormously supported individuals in keeping an insight into the passing scenes.
On the other hand, the role played by professional photographers is irrefutable in the visual industry. In fact, most of them inherently have an artistic vision and specialise in certain genres, like portrait or landscape, so they are sensitive and competent enough to unleash the beauty of the scopes. Hence, in comparison to those snapped by amateur counterparts, their works are believed to have a higher aesthetic quality, which explains why brands mostly entrust them with promotional campaigns. Another noteworthy point is that their expertise, ranging from lighting, composition and post-processing skills, enable visual experts to offer viewers an in-depth illustration. Therefore, their images can serve an educational purpose, which not only nurture artistic talents but also contribute to materials for other science.
In brief, while not disavowing the significance of technological devices, it seems to me that photographers can not be entirely superseded in today’s society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-10 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
- In today s digital age anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs this accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people think studying in university is a waste of time and money. They are supposed that young people should work for real experience. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people believe that children should be educated by the nature while others think it wastes their time and they should only study at school. Which option do you choose? 89
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school is planned for the area. The map shows to possible sites for the school. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...rts are no longer high on demand. While I accept that technological advancements ...
^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... replace them in several circumstances, I believe that visual professions remain ...
^
Line 3, column 834, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing an insight into the passing scenes. On the other hand, the role played by pr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...futable in the visual industry. In fact, most of them inherently have an artistic...
^^
Line 5, column 831, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tribute to materials for other science. In brief, while not disavowing the signi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, in brief, in fact, in general, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83713355049 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25899306028 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657980456026 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4852243742 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.846153846 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139824485103 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505827318031 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396885040166 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915641588101 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263181355713 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.