The Power of Volunteer
Volunteerism is a transformative force, driving social change and addressing community needs. Volunteers contribute not only their time and skills but also bring passion and innovation to causes they care about. The power of volunteerism lies in its ability to bridge gaps where institutional support may fall short. By mobilizing grassroots efforts, volunteers can catalyze real change, from disaster relief to long-term community development projects. Volunteers create social value by empowering individuals and fostering a sense of collective responsibility. Through direct action, they facilitate access to resources, promote awareness, and strengthen social ties. The sense of community forged by volunteers can lead to more resilient societies, capable of addressing pressing social issues. On a larger scale, volunteerism contributes to social capital, enhancing civic engagement and trust within communities. Volunteers often serve as informal leaders, influencing others to act and participate in the collective good. Their work can also act as a proving ground for new solutions to entrenched problems, offering a flexible and dynamic approach to social issues that traditional institutions might struggle to implement. In essence, the power of volunteerism lies in its ability to mobilize people for collective impact, turning individual actions into societal change.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-11 | Phạm Duy Tân | 56 | view |
2023-08-11 | Phạm Minh Hân | 78 | view |
2023-08-11 | Phạm Minh Hân | 78 | view |
2023-08-11 | Phạm Minh Hân | 78 | view |
2021-08-28 | Moin Uddin Ahammed | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00507614213 4.92477711251 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16788687104 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680203045685 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6843753362 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.545454545 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222434526382 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073494789962 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562123476187 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222434526382 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 61.2550243902 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.28 11.4140731707 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.06136585366 133% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.