Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Language is a symbol of a nation. Recently, some languages disappear year-by-year and many people argue that this phenomenon is not giving a bad impact for people life if in this world has fewer languages. However, I believe this statement is reasonable, but I tend to agree that several languages have fundamentally different characteristics.
On the one hand, living in this world with fewer languages is simple. People can communicate with others easily and they can widen networking around the world without a hazard. An obvious example can be seen in the developed countries where almost people use English language as a mother language. Thus, they can perform a monetary transaction in the economic global and arouse someone interest to invest much money in their company with a great communication skill. So, limited languages to interact with people result in flexibility and provide a great accuracy.
On the other hand, it is felt that many kinds of language from each nation should be encouraged as an inheritance. Firstly, traditional languages should not be neglected because it is an identity of each country. Indonesia, for example, has many traditional languages but many Indonesian are not keen on learning about. They tend to study other International languages such as English and Germany language, so Indonesian's culture will not exist. In addition, some languages are a history and take a part in this world. People who live in the modern era can absorb the differences history as per each language. For instance, with Arabic language, Muslims know how prophets struggled to keep their religion. Consequently, all languages must be protected due to a crucial aspect of human life.
In conclusion, it seems to me that fewer languages in the earth only show us how to keep in touch with modern situation, while many languages avoid to pass up a chance of seeing the past and future circumstance. I believe that people should appreciate the different languages and should not be neglected them.
- While some people prefer to live in apartments, others do not think an apartment is a suitable form of accommodation.Do you think the advantages of living in an apartment outweigh the disadvantages? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts.Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion. 80
- These days, many children have difficulty paying attention and concentrating in their classes at school.What are the reasons for this?How can it be dealt with? 85
- the cycle of water from rainfall to usable wate 60
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or reaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
many people argue that this phenomenon is not giving a bad impact for people life
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to people and life
if in this world has fewer languages.
if in this world it has fewer languages.
and should not be neglected them.
and should not neglect them. //or they should not be neglected.
Sentence: Thus, they can perform a monetary transaction in the economic global and arouse someone interest to invest much money in their company with a great communication skill.
Description: A pronoun, nominal is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to someone and interest
Sentence: In addition, some languages are a history and take a part in this world.
Description: The fragment 'a history and' is not usually preceded by are
Sentence: People who live in the modern era can absorb the differences history as per each language.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to differences and history
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 329 350
No. of Characters: 1647 1500
No. of Different Words: 182 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.259 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.814 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.278 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.935 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.322 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.491 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.088 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5