Transport Modes in a European City 1960-2000
The bar chart describes the transport modes preferred by travellers in a European city from 1960 to 2000 shown in percentage.
In 1960, instead of using vehicles, most of the travellers would rather explore European city by foot – 34%. Another 25% of them chose bicycle. Motor vehicles, bus and car, were the least popular means whose percentage of tourists using both modes was 18% and 6% respectively.
The condition was quite different in 1980 where tourists were more into public transportation than any other modes – 25% of them exploring the city by bus, 22% by car, 20% by bike, and only 17% by foot.
Meanwhile, in 2000, the most favorite transportation mode was car rocketed from 22% in 1980 to more than 35%. The mass transportation, bus, was not so popular as before – 16%. Furthermore, in contrast to 1960, tourists seemed to leave these two eco-friendly transport modes – foot and bike. Foot was choosen by less than 10% tourist, while bike was preferred by 6% of them.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2024-10-10 | wholemilk | 78 | view |
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992 76
- Main Reason for Migration to from The UK in 2007 81
- The line graph illustrates the regular use of a car in a household of The Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 shown in percentages. 85
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on your children. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Changes in Spending Habits of People in UK between 1971 and 2001 70
the most favorite transportation mode was car rocketed from 22% in 1980 to more than 35%
the most favorite transportation mode which was car rocketed from 22% in 1980 to more than 35%
Sentence: Foot was choosen by less than 10 tourist, while bike was preferred by 6 of them.
Error: choosen Suggestion: choose
flaw:
What is '–'?
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 773 1000
No. of Different Words: 94 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.52 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.769 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 41 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.179 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.416 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.647 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.164 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4