The line graphs show the production and demand for steel in million stones and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010.
The graphs given illustrate how many million stones of steel were produced and demanded and the number of employees taken on in the steel industry during 2010 in UK.
It is noticeable that the amount of steel generated far exceeded the actual sales, except the last month of the period. The labourers in the steel industry experienced a
consistent and noticeable change.
In the first three months, the amount of steel manufactured showed a fluctuation between 4000 and 5000, beginning to be twice as much as that of real demand before hitting its peak at 5000, corresponding with a consistent rise in the demand. Turning to the next four months, the production hovered around 4000 whereas the need was volatile, ranging from around 2000 to nearly 3000. From July, both figures changed dramatically, while the number of steel generated ended the period with a plummet to its bottom at under 1000, the demand bounced back to 2000 after falling to practically 0.
As for the number of workers employed, the figure showed a rise in the first month before plunging dramatically to 3000. From March to September, the laborers in the steel industry oscillated between 2500 and 3500. Afterwards, the figure dropped steadily and ended the year at 1000.
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people try to balance work and other parts of their life However this is very difficult to do What are the problems associated with this What is the best way to achieve a better balance 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
- The line graphs show the production and demand for steel in million stones and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 56
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the steel industry during 2010 in UK. It is noticeable that the amount of stee...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rers in the steel industry experienced a consistent and noticeable change. In...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 209.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00956937799 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61694058269 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 176.041082164 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564593301435 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 506.74238477 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2807061646 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36507061538 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135188487073 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122361539532 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186228610029 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146275313124 0.056905535591 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.