Essay topics:
aaaaa
Even though the fundamental essence of educational quality or equity emphasizes the significance of the curriculum reforms intended to improve equity, the corresponding impacts of the increasing breadth or differentiation in offerings in a way such as increases differences in quality and improvement the quality of education are acknowledged, and widespread demand for high-level skills could be inferred evidently from diminution opportunity for the low-skilled, which the potential implications of reproducing existing social arrangements as well as the capacity of schooling to build social cohesion are presumed.
Votes
This essay topic by users
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-16 | Bmona93 | 11 | view |
| 2017-04-14 | tmlong2000 | 11 | view |
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 0.0 20.9802955665 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 31.9359605911 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 531.0 1207.87684729 44% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 87.0 242.827586207 36% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.10344827586 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.05407580998 3.92707691288 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58808527288 2.71678728327 132% => OK
Unique words: 62.0 139.433497537 44% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.712643678161 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 172.8 379.143842365 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6551724138 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 87.0 20.5024630542 424% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 50.4703680194 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 531.0 104.977214359 506% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 87.0 20.9669160288 415% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 33.0 7.25397266985 455% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.242375264174 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0925447433944 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151781067708 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 50.8 12.6369458128 402% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -50.67 53.1260098522 -95% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.54236453202 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 41.9 10.9458128079 383% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 19.28 11.5310837438 167% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.21 8.32886699507 183% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 55.0591133005 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 61.5 9.94827586207 618% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 36.8 10.3980295567 354% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 10.5123152709 590% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.