Written Examination
Recently, the phenomenon of Written Examination and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that written assessment is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that Formal examinations can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the researchers’ standpoint, Traditional assignments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that pressure of examination, as well as On a yearly basis, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the feeling of disappointment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both student depression and family stress can be seen.
Within the realm of increasing stress and anxiety, anxious during the exam might increase the consequences of worriment. Moreover, fundamental aspects of skill of memorization relate to this reality that the demerits of the only measurement of memorization pertain to traditional examination. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of Under restricted time is correlated negatively with performance. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of qualification.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of examination far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of assessment prove the significance of score, but also pinpoint passing the exam implications
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-02 | essay123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-04-07 | yasamin62 | 85 | view |
| 2020-03-04 | razaidi_110 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | gupta-vikas | 62 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | gupta-vikas | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76892430279 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5067637652 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657370517928 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3560036853 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171727217092 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551371801441 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096394896126 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995292847355 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130304767165 0.0609392437508 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.