Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get to advantages with the development of air travel.
The important of air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get to advantages with the development of air travel which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one stem from the fact that now days many airplane is increasing time by time which is more good because we can go emergency time quickly one place to other place. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that 80% people do traveling on air plane and some people do want air travel. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming on e is that all people cannot air travel because some people not rich any people poor also they have not money with this they are travel in plane. Besides, 2010 in only 30% people do travel because all people have not more money. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of air travel and people many people do like air travel are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawback should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | English time | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | English time | 77 | view |
- Should university penalize student for late submission their work? 77
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year, what are the causes of this crucial problem? What is the solution? 64
- Around the world, solar energy is becoming a more popular source of energy for many households. 55
- Experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 77
- some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers. others believe that a women's role should be limited to taking care of the house and children. which opinion do you agree with and why? 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill lead to a logical conclusion. There are myriad of reasons which will f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun airplane seems to be countable; consider using: 'many airplanes'.
Suggestion: many airplanes
...nt one stem from the fact that now days many airplane is increasing time by time which is mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97610921502 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53421645201 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529010238908 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.7427075555 50.4703680194 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.153846154 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477184574362 0.242375264174 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185606921207 0.0925447433944 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.22173795043 0.071462118173 310% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319037880043 0.151781067708 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855788465003 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.