Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of product. Give your views any relevant example with your own experience.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the producer to avoid extra packaging of product in all over the world. There is a widespread worry that this will lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are number of arguments in favor my stance. The most preponderant one is that the producer to avoid extra packaging of product can not only contribute to the over packaged product harm to the environment and society, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits are stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of the producer to avoid extra packaging of product.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of the producer to avoid extra packaging of product are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | English time | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90384615385 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80228932193 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526923076923 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9220333934 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.909090909 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246008878442 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101110285439 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120510416407 0.071462118173 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169347623198 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045850238421 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.