Machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is no prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people
The discussion on machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is no prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people is a debatable topic and people around the globe are divided in their argument. The subject attract majority of view from people and remain a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay, I shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant example and explanation berfore drawing any conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact thta now days many manchine increasing day by day which is not bad because the machine is more halpful in human life and some people do like machine. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that 2017 in 60% people depend on machine if they are us eto machine and they are do time save. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are soem pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that in these many people want to use machine but which is more bad because machine with more pollution create. Besides, 70% put bad effects machine of envornment with this many problem increased. HGence it is apparent why many are agsinst this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of there are so many type of advantages of manchine are instrumental inddeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-05 | English time | 77 | view |
- In many parts of the world today there is a profitable market for the products which lighten or whiten people skin out line the reasons for using such product and discuss what effects they have in terms of health society ? 55
- it is more important student to study history and literature then it is for them to study since and mathematics use specific reasons. 55
- Imitating celebrities in sports and movies is good or bad. 77
- Fresh water resources diminsh in large cities in the world each year what are the cause of this crucial problem. What are the solution / 80
- Experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...if they are us eto machine and they are do time save. Needless to say, all these m...
^^
Line 9, column 343, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...effects machine of envornment with this many problem increased. HGence it is apparent why ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 114, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...usion that the benefits of there are so many type of advantages of manchine are instrumen...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00727272727 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65992978221 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.3274929083 50.4703680194 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.181818182 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390319591764 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128303812045 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.210500818305 0.071462118173 295% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208787663924 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.202799446746 0.0609392437508 333% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.