Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believes that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform.
Recently, the phenomenon of a robot machines by taking human jobs on the basis of a artificial intelligence and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that robots will perform all types of works, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, these robotic machines can take care all employments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when there is ease of doing work by machines such as computer instrument used in car and plane play a significant role by automation etc. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, robotic machines might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of robotic machines far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | architakamjps@gmail.com | 79 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | viviana | 70 | view |
| 2019-04-19 | mohab.elhaddad | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | AmirTheGreat | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | pippipeo | 72 | view |
- A county becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Other believe that action by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that it is only governments and large business which can make a difference. Discuss th 77
- Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledged at school? 55
- A county becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The role of human cloning has accelerated rapidly. To what extent you think will it replace the material things? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of a robot mach...
^^
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...es by taking human jobs on the basis of a artificial intelligence and its corresp...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. From a general standpoint, these robotic...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted procedures apparently can be seen. Within the realm of a public arena, robo...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... notion of this remarkable phenomenon. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50769230769 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13965851986 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665384615385 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9271918678 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.181818182 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271248867989 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868618522218 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888592383748 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142006478099 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070265570171 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.