The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification.
The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices was always a debatable topic. Many people working in corporate offices believe that employees behaving with such activities should be punished severely. I strongly agree with the statement that such behaviors is unacceptable. This essay would further elaborate the reasons why such behaviors are not encouraged in office premises with clear example and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
Firstly, modern established companies and organizations are organized with certain guidelines and policies under several categories to support the employees. Although belching is biological, it is inappropriate method of releasing air from your filled stomach and it is not accepted in social culture that we live. It also disturb others and make them feel uncomfortable. For example, employee after having heavy lunch in afternoon, releases a sudden gas through his mouth which will be very disturbing to other employees.
Secondly, good understanding between employers and employees are important which attributes growth of organization but few employees do unacceptable behavior that creates problematic situation. There are various situations which causes these behaviors and further employer have to deal with these problems accordingly and effectively. Some of the unauthorized problems such as accessing restricted content from company website makes a huge lose for employer. Furthermore, bullying other employees, bad manners, harassment, abusive language, aggressive and many more are some of the problems. From the above it can analyzed that employee involved in such activities may also lead to termination.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that employees involving in belching and behaving against company policies will be treated with strict policies and sometimes organizations ask employees to put their resignations.
- The importance of cars and airplane in modern life. Give example. 77
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport 85
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on peoples life and work 89
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'disturbs'?
Suggestion: disturbs
...in social culture that we live. It also disturb others and make them feel uncomfortable...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...e problems accordingly and effectively. Some of the unauthorized problems such as accessing...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... language, aggressive and many more are some of the problems. From the above it can analyze...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'analyze'
Suggestion: analyze
... of the problems. From the above it can analyzed that employee involved in such activiti...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91843971631 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13533137031 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641843971631 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0737634755 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.214285714 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165746895518 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593632151302 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618671716641 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960084362835 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555780805886 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.