building design
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on designing of building can lead to thought-provoking discussion. My view is irrespective of the numerous arguments which were exited on either side, draw special care to design building can influence positively both senior and young generation.
There are several constructive aspects in favor of my stance. To commence with, design building can be considered as a piece of art and it is as a part of nation’s heritage. Moreover, it is crucial to consider that as soon as building design is part of people’s culture, future generations need it. For instance, as per a study which was published recently, more than fifth from British citizens consider building design can develop youngster intercultural skills. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that governments should launch awareness campaigns to enhance their nations’ knowledge about building design.
Another vital aspect which was associated with building design is that it might save countries history. Additionally, once people draw special care to this piece of art, a lot of historical events can be memorized. Consequently, it exemplified that educationalists have to conduct extra-curricular activities to shed more light on the importance of building design.
In conclusion, after I manifested the above notions, it could be observed that there is equally potential evidence to support my view, and hence my opinion is that building design has several positive points for nations and individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | aymanwahab | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66804979253 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33305841856 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639004149378 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6945556616 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.181818182 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.492574228618 0.242375264174 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205762155762 0.0925447433944 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101447021205 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305128120364 0.151781067708 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739371253905 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.