study old novels
conjunAlthough topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on high school students study plays written centuries ago can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My view is irrespective of the numerous arguments that exits on either sides, children's study of old plays can develop their personalities as per the following illustration.
On one hand, there are numerous benefits which were associated with this argument. To commence with, study old written novels and plays, this could develop interpersonal skills and enhance their cognitive skills. Additionally, it is crucial to consider that these old plays might boost their knowledge and develop the learning skills of students. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that governments should launch awareness campaigns to enhance people's awareness of old plays.
On the other hand, as any coin has two sides, theatres written works associated with few drawbacks. First and foremost, as soon as students study this material, they may be not updated by technological breakthrough science. For example, as per a recent study which was published by Oxford University, two out of four from British youngsters are of the belief that these novels are time-consuming. Consequently, educationalists should conduct extra-curricular activities to shed more light on old novels.
In conclusion, after I manifested the above ideas, it is clearly observed that there is equally potential evidence to support my arguments, and hence my opinion is that old novels' study has some privileges.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-18 | aymanwahab | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | aymanwahab | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: ConjunAlthough
conjunAlthough topics, in all likelihood, will never y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69327731092 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3081531934 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9274134788 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.181818182 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3695588994 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121114282477 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965467800964 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219357386234 0.151781067708 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410906422987 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.