public transportation
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on using of public transportation or building infrastructure roads in crowded cities can lead to thought-provoking discussion. My view is irrespective of the enormous arguments which were exit on either side, using of eco-friendly way of transportation could solve this chronic issue as per the following illustration.
To commence with, using public transportation’s method have various benefits and can solve the conjunction issue in big cities. Moreover, it is crucial to consider that when people use public transportation method, roads will be less crowded and environment will be less polluted. For example, according to a recent study which was published recently, if people do cycling, and this will reduce carbon footprint. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that public authorities should conduct extra-curricular activities to enhance people’s awareness of public transportation.
In Addition, using more efficient was of transportation will influence cities more clean air, and this can lead to healthier citizens. It is vital to consider that while people go to their work on foot; this can reduce their blood pressure. Hence, it exemplifies that governments should launch awareness campaigns to enhance their nations’ knowledge about public transportation.
In conclusion, after I manifested the above notions, it could be observed that there is equally potential evidence to support my stance, and hence my opinion is public transportation is more beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | nganvuong | 55 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'exited'.
Suggestion: exited
...ve of the enormous arguments which were exit on either side, using of eco-friendly w...
^^^^
Line 6, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...blic transportation is more beneficial.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88085106383 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.59502699624 2.71678728327 132% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612765957447 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1705528611 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.2 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347606429895 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137592254292 0.0925447433944 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876995273971 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217924068248 0.151781067708 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624073025805 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.