handwriting
Although topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on handwriting and typing at school can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My view is irrespective of the numerous arguments that exits in either sides, good handwriting has several beneficial points for young generations and nations as per the following illustration.
First and foremost, there are numerous reasons in favor of my stance. To commence with, the handwriting can increase the interpersonal skills, and cognitive skills of young people. Additionally, when the Oxford University made a survey about handwriting benefits in 2006, it was observed that more than half of scientists had this skill during their school days. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion show that the governments should launch awareness campaigns to boost their nation's knowledge about handwriting.
Secondly, another pivotal aspect of my argument is that handwriting might share in increasing the imagination of students. Moreover, as soon as World Education Organization conduct a study in 2010 about handwriting constructive effect on students, it was found that the students who have this talent probably join one of the top-tier institutions. Consequently, it exemplifies that the educationalists have to conduct extra-curricular activities to raise adolescents' awareness about handwriting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-08 | pbdarab | 85 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | shyamsingh08 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | mndpsngh21 | 82 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | mndpsngh21 | 72 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 200.0 242.827586207 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5035838794 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7263283139 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.888888889 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293737061415 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115813913091 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854490063717 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196945698761 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198732149301 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.