Business and commercial organizations should help to solve environmental challenges. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of "business and commercial organizations should help to solve environmental challenges" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that commercial organizations might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that solving environmental problems can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, the help of business and commercial organizations to solve environmental challenges can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that fund allocations and payments of firms are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of big organizations in environmental issues. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both spending money by companies and commercial incentives distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, the roles of organizations to solve environmental challenges might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of climate change. Moreover, fundamental aspects of global warming can relate to the reality that the demerits of big companies can pertain to greenhouse gas emission. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of wildlife preservation were correlated positively with business organizations, the local authorities would ultimately address in danger species. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the protection of the earth.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the help of business and commercial organizations to solve environmental challenges far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-06 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | assnoobhole | 77 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people think that life experience is more important than the formal education provided is schools and universities How far do you agree with this statement and provide examples 88
- Governments should not put too much attention on arts such as theaters Governments should allocate more funds to areas of concern Do you agree with this opinion or not Use your own experience to support your idea 67
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates of US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- Internet or media is bad for young people because they make the young generation poor in communication and forming relationships Do you agree with this opinion Please use examples or your personal experience to support your idea 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05208333333 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56339840036 2.71678728327 131% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3872384601 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.454545455 104.977214359 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321648672684 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108538574225 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933915812954 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197930225229 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056780044648 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 12.6369458128 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 53.1260098522 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.11 11.5310837438 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.