Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views.
Recently, the phenomenon of using the Internet instead of traditional classrooms and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that online education might be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that substitution of teachers for Internet can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, using the Internet to teach pupils can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that intelligent school, as well as smart classroom, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of eliminating tutors. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both enhancing the quality of studying and improving online discussion apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, replacing classroom teacher with Internet might increase the consequences of reinforcing the quality of education. Moreover, fundamental aspects of technology relate to this reality that the demerits of online teaching pertain to replacing the presence of teacher in classrooms. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of replacing a human professor is correlated negatively with understanding a particular topic. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of learning systems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of spreading Internet and substituting teachers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of such concept prove the significance of promoting the contemporary ideas, but also pinpoint the academic performance implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | sunilkms | 35 | view |
| 2018-06-18 | IZAD | 89 | view |
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 77
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 77
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 88
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion. 88
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79787234043 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31133718853 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641843971631 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7119013045 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26632725276 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796426925079 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689650746809 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135332225466 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435685794529 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.