Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views.
Recently, the replacement of internet in classroom teacher has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "can the internet replace the classroom teacher?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, traditional teaching methods are bound up inextricably with classroom, which indicates they lead to both assessment and examination. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between human capability and mental ability as well as an exponential increase in student's performance. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of private schools is correlated positively with not only syllabus but also interaction between teacher and students.
Within the realm of economy, without the slightest doubt, rural areas attribute to not having facilities, in that it would come down to cost, large investment, and lack of skilled staff. A salient example of such attribution is electronic learning, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take replacement for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint not availability of sufficient school’s problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to E-books, high school, and even easy access. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of internet and public connection.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the internet is of high importance, but it cannot be replaced with classroom teacher. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | sunilkms | 35 | view |
| 2018-06-18 | IZAD | 89 | view |
- With technology speeding up, more and more young people begin to use mobile phones and the Internet, but old people have little chance to be exposed to them. What ways could mobile phone and the Internet be useful to old people? How can old people be enco 88
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on student's work if it is late? 85
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals? 85
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? (Discuss with appropriate examples.) 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the educational standpoint, traditi...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion between teacher and students. Within the realm of economy, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of internet and public connection. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79322033898 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20651089998 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677966101695 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7105178978 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225065821633 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620949817021 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108132166936 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146129089143 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13880805867 0.0609392437508 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.