Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the effects of building design in people's life has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the impacts of biulding design on people's life and work?". Whereas it is a widely held view that design of biulding has negative impacts on people's life, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the psychology standpoint, biulding architecture is bound up inextricably with indivisual's mind, which indicates it leads both positive and negative impacts on life. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2019 demonstrates the relationship between building materials and art works as well as an exponential increase in creativity ability of indivisuals. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of traditional architecture is correlated positively with not only cultural values but also life style.
Within the realm of biulding industry, without the slightest doubt, work enviornment attribute to warm enviornment, in that it would come down to higher performance, good human behaviors, and cerativity inspiration. A salient example of such attribution is dark biulding, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take stressful conditions for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint design of building problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to a valuable painting, momumental sculpture, and even high ceiling. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of architectures.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that building design has both positive and negative impacts on human life and work. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | jeeva | 77 | view |
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 88
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 77
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, or to increase knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- “Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society”. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 80
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far su...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67213114754 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15157528341 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64262295082 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8043160066 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.076923077 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350296824504 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959104449312 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106912862698 0.071462118173 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199098449538 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116183049998 0.0609392437508 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.