Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, impact of building design on people's life and work has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the positive and negative consequence of building design". Whereas it is a widely held view that building design has negative impact on people's life and work, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, design process is bound up inextricably with monumental architectural, which indicates it lead to both architectural features and modern construction. As a well-knwon example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between enviornmental design and cultural values as well as an exponential increase in people lifestyle. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidenc presented thaus far supports the contention that the likelihood of a luxury apartment is correlated positively with not only efficiency in work but also life values.
Within the realm of art world, without the slightest doubt, mental health attribute to landscape architectural, in taht it would come down to a different perspective, a licensed architect, and art class. A salient example of such attribution is construction workers, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take property developer for granted. Hda there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint inefficiency in work and life problems. Likewise, hardy had they confined their attention to ancient customs, human life, and even remote cottage. Hnece, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of art in personal's life and work.
To conclude,as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I frimly believe that design of building has positive impact on people's life and work. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceieve the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | jeeva | 77 | view |
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- Company top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to make any decisions. Discuss. 85
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What are your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to? 85
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree? 85
- what roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...ental architectural, which indicates it lead to both architectural features and mode...
^^^^
Line 6, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...n personals life and work. To conclude,as for myself, as the saying goes 'al...
^^^
Line 6, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, likewise, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 309.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57281553398 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16777071704 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647249190939 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6909264597 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.461538462 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378587861116 0.242375264174 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11323691698 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130010588746 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221925660971 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156526957997 0.0609392437508 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.