Whether the design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
The effect of the designs of buildings on people’s lifestyle, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of the architecture of edifices has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on people’s personal life in recent years. it can be agreed that the structure of constructions has some positive impacts, but some people claim that it has some negative as well. this essay will elaborate the positive aspects of well-structured building on the working environment and mental health of people, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the architecture of buildings has benefits in employee’s performance, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that people working in a well-designed building feel proud and are eager to work with more zeal. For instance, innovative designs and buildings encourage employees to work more better and at the same time it will also increase the productivity of workers which in turn yields good profits and reputation to the organization. building designs, therefore, can play a vital role to improve employee productivity.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that modern buildings with appropriate good ventilation facilities and adequate space attributes improve the health of people. As an illustration, buildings with innovative designs and good area distribution may reduce the level of stress caused by crowded offices. Enough space distribution, hence, can play a vital role for people’s mental health.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of the architecture of edifices is prominent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | jeeva | 77 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- writing examination 55
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If it is compulsory in a democratic society, what conclusions can we draw about ‘Nature of democracy?’ 80
- In developing countries, tourism has advantages and disadvantages. 77
- If Voting Is Compulsory In A Democratic Society, What Conclusions Can We Draw About Nature Of Democracy? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he effect of the designs of buildings on people's lifestyle, which was alway...
^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e's personal life in recent years. it can be agreed that the structure of con...
^^
Line 1, column 443, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...laim that it has some negative as well. this essay will elaborate the positive aspec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...d buildings encourage employees to work more better and at the same time it will also incre...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Building
...its and reputation to the organization. building designs, therefore, can play a vital ro...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56015037594 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24234553492 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1786323832 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.454545455 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298810863725 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101129019674 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534121028807 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155701136367 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989672973233 0.0609392437508 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.